Motion To Compel Further Discovery Responses
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Matter on the LAW AND MOTION / DISCOVERY Calendar on Friday, Jun-26-2026. LINE 8. 2-PLAINTIFF CREDIBLE OPERATIONS, INC.'s, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Motion To Compel Further Discovery Responses.
Plaintiff Credible Operations, Inc.'s motion to compel further discovery responses is granted in part and continued for hearing in part to August 28, 2026. The court has exercised its discretion to consider Credible's statement narrowing the discovery dispute, submitted for filing on June 25, 2026.
By companion order, the court has denied defendant NerdWallet Inc.'s motion for protective order or stay, and the court now overrules NerdWallet's objections that discovery is premature. However, NerdWallet has interposed other objections and Credible has not met and conferred about those objections. The parties are ordered to meet and confer and to make good faith attempts to resolve their discovery disputes. The parties are invited to request an informal discovery conference if they reach impasse by contacting the court through calendar301@sftc.org.
If disputes remain for resolution at the August 28 hearing, Credible shall submit a supplemental brief with declarations two weeks in advance of the continued hearing date. If NerdWallet has amended its discovery responses in the interim, Credible shall provide an updated separate statement. NerdWallet may respond with a supplemental brief with declarations one week in advance of the continued hearing date, and an updated separate statement if warranted. The parties may also seek a continuance of the hearing, but please notify the court at least three court days in advance of any requested scheduling changes.
Credible seeks sanctions. The court does not award sanctions on this interim order but provides notice to both parties that sanctions are mandatory against the unsuccessful party on a discovery motion unless the court finds unjust circumstances or that an unsuccessful party's position had substantial justification, i.e. was well grounded in fact and law. The court will consider sanctions at any continued hearing.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |