MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA SETTLEMENT
Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →
LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JUNE 23, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.
TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES
Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.
Nos. 21CV02110, 21CV01946, 21CV02782, 22CV02565
ESPINOZA et al. v. ENCOMPASS COMMUNITY SERVICES
(UNOPPOSED) MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA SETTLEMENT
Based on the pleadings submitted, the settlement is entitled to a presumption of fairness and no evidence having been presented to overcome the presumption, the motion for final approval is granted. The Court will sign the proposed order and judgment, and will set a nonappearance hearing date to confirm the distribution.
No. 26CV01693
SILVA v. SILVA
PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION REGARDING IMMEDIATE RETURN OF VEHICLE
The application is denied.
Plaintiff seeks the return of a vehicle she used during her annulled marriage to defendant. Plaintiff’s declaration filed June 16, 2026, states the vehicle she seeks returned (2020 Ford Expedition) was her primary and exclusive vehicle and she contributed to its payments and maintenance. She declares the Family Court never issued an order requiring the vehicle be returned to Gavin Silva. She describes that on May 12, 2026, Mr. Silva repossessed the vehicle in the parking lot of Scotts Valley High with the couple’s twin sons present.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”