Christopher M. Huber vs. California Fair Plan Association
Motion for Summary Judgment
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
said objection and appears for CMC, parties are deemed to have waived notice of trial AND asserted they will waive conflict at the MSC allowing the trial judge to conduct the MSC.
5. CU0001113 Christopher M. Huber vs. California Fair Plan Association No appearances are required. The Court previously granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to all causes of action. Accordingly, this matter is off calendar for CMC; however, the Court admonishes Defendant as to submission of an order after hearing which includes a dismissal of the action.
6. CU0001178 Gregory Ludlum vs. Joshua Terranova, Executor, et al. No appearances are required. Based on the representations of the parties, the Court continues the case management conference to May 15, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., in Department A to permit additional time to complete mediation.
7. CU0001273 Edward De Jesus Jimenez vs. Inderpreet Singh, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to April 17, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., in Department A to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
8. CU0001445 James B. House vs. Gregory Atchley, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s own motion the case management conference and the order to show cause are continued to May 15, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department A to allow the pending motion to serve by publication to be heard. Plaintiff shall provide notice of the continued court date.
9. CU0001584 Matthew Coulter vs. Mark Olsen, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to May 15, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., in Department A to permit pending motions to be adjudicated.
10. CU0001662 Pankaj Gupta vs. Bamboo Ide8 Insurance Services, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to May 15, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., in Department A. This case is not yet at issue. Defendant Sutton National Insurance shall file a responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint, or Plaintiff shall file a request for default or a request for dismissal of Defendant prior to the continued court date. Plaintiff shall provide notice of the continued court date.
11. CU0001681 Randy Ryan Agno, et al. vs. James L Gould, IV. et al. No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to April 17, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department A. A third amended complaint has recently been filed. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading, or Plaintiff shall file a request for default (as appropriate) or request for dismissal of Defendants at least two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.
12. CU0001840 Richard A. Perdomo Canales v. Best Western International, Inc., et al.
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.