Bifurcation to Terminate Marital Status; Spousal Support; Dissolving DAAK
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED FAMILY COURT
AMY KUBASAK ALTON, Petitioner VS. DIRK ALTON, Respondent)))))))))))) Case Number: FDI-25-801544 Hearing Date: June 23, 2026 Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Department: 403 Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA
REQUEST FOR ORDER: BIFURCATION TO TERMINATE MARITAL STATUS; REQUEST FOR ORDER: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT, DISSOLVING OF DAAK TENTATIVE RULING Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the Court makes the following findings and orders: A. Procedural History 1) The parties are Petitioner Amy Kubasak Alton (Wife) and Respondent Dirk Alton (Husband). There are no minor children subject to this proceeding. 2) On 6/10/25, Wife filed a Petition for Dissolution indicating the date of marriage is 11/13/10 and date of separation is 6/7/25 for a marriage of 14 years and 7 months. 3) On 8/1/25, Husband filed a Response and Request for Dissolution indicating the date of marriage is 11/13/10 and date of separation is 6/7/25 for a marriage of 14 years and 7 months. 4) On 4/27/26, Wife filed a Request for Order seeking bifurcation of trial and termination of marital status attached to which is form FL-315 (Request for Separate Trial) and a proposed Status Only Judgment. 5) On 5/14/26, Wife filed a Request for Order and supportive declaration seeking guideline temporary spousal support and leave of Court to dissolve the community business – a corporation called "DAAK" – due to concerns regarding Husband's control and management, with
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
appointment of a forensic accountant and/or receiver. Wife attached a proposed XSpouse calculation. Wife alleges Husband has mismanaged the community property business, mishandled funds, and breached his fiduciary duty to Wife. 6) On 5/24/26, Wife filed an Income and Expense Declaration. 7) On 6/9/26, Husband filed a Responsive Declaration in agreement with Wife’s request for bifurcation of trial and termination of marital status so long as all applicable Family Code section 2337 conditions are imposed on Wife (since she is the moving party), with all remaining issues expressly reserved. 8) On 6/9/26, Husband filed a Responsive Declaration and supportive declaration in opposition to Wife’s Request for Order seeking temporary spousal support and dissolution of DAAK.
Husband requests this issue be continued to allow Wife to submit to a vocational evaluation and the parties to meet and confer regarding: (a) updated financial disclosures; (b) exchange of DAAK records and account information; (c) selection of a neutral accountant, if necessary; and (d) dissolution of DAAK after completion of existing World Cup-related work. Husband requests the Court use his actual monthly income for support and impute income to Wife in the interim. Husband states a receiver would do more harm than good.
Husband alleges Wife liquidated community property accounts. 9) On 6/9/26, Husband filed a supportive attorney declaration. 10) On 6/9/26, Husband filed a Memorandum of Points and Authorities. 11) On 6/9/26, Husband filed an Income and Expense Declaration. 12) On 6/17/26, Wife filed a Reply Declaration in support of her Request for Order seeking temporary spousal support and dissolution of DAAK. Wife states she liquidated community property funds in good faith because Husband is under investigation for tax fraud.
B. Findings and Order 1) Bifurcation and Termination of Marital Status: Public policy favors bifurcation and termination of marital status. 2) The Court finds that Wife’s request for bifurcation of trial and termination of marital status is unopposed.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
3) Based on the pleadings filed with the Court and signed under penalty of perjury, the Court further finds that: a. Wife filed a Petition for Dissolution on 6/10/25. b. Under Family Code section 2339(a), the Court first acquired jurisdiction over Husband when Husband was served with Wife’s Petition and Summons on 6/26/25. c. Husband filed a Response and Request for Dissolution on 8/1/25. d. Within the Petition and Response, both parties indicate that they were residents of California for at least six months and of San Francisco County for at least three months immediately preceding the filing of the Petition. e.
Within the Petition and Response, both parties request a divorce based on irreconcilable differences. f. On 1/30/26, Wife filed a Declaration Regarding Service of Declaration of Disclosure stating that Petitioner’s/Wife’s Preliminary Declaration of Disclosure was served on Husband’s attorney by email on 1/30/26. g. In her Request for Separate Trial (attached to her 5/9/25 Request for Order), Wife answered the prompt “All pension or retirement plans in which the community has an interest are listed below” by listing the following accounts: i.
Petitioner's LPL Financial x3655 ii. Petitioner's LPL Financial x3479 Rollover IRA iii. Respondent's Capital Group/American Funds x3866 IRA h. The Court therefore finds that there are no retirement plans that need to be joined in this action under Family Code section 2337(d). 4) Based on the foregoing, Wife’s unopposed request to bifurcate and terminate the parties’ marital status is GRANTED. Each party is restored to their previous single status as of 6/23/26. The Court finds that this termination date meets the requirement set forth in Family Code section 2339(a). 5) As set forth in the attached Bifurcation of Status of Marriage (FL-347), the protections of Family Code section 2337(c)(1)-(6) shall apply.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
6) The parties are reminded that despite the termination of their marital status the Standard Family Law Restraining Orders set forth in the Summons continue to apply to both parties per Family Code section 233(a). 7) The Court’s jurisdiction to adjudicate all remaining issues in this dissolution matter is reserved. 8) Temporary Spousal Support and Other Orders: The Court finds good cause to GRANT Husband’s request to continue Wife’s Request for Order filed 5/14/26 to 9/22/26 at 9 AM in Dept. 403.
However, the Court also finds good cause to issue the following interim orders: 9) Wife’s request for appointment of a receiver is DENIED without prejudice. 10) The parties shall meet and confer regarding appointment of a joint neutral forensic accountant to review DAAK's finances, trace revenues and expenditures, and determine the extent of any commingling or diversion of funds. 11) Wife’s request for temporary spousal support is GRANTED, effective 5/14/26. In accordance with the XSpouse report attached hereto and incorporated herein, Husband shall pay Wife $5,150 in temporary spousal support by the 1 st of every month.
Payments shall commence 7/1/26. 12) The XSpouse inputs are based on the parties respective Income and Expense Declarations, which they each signed under penalty of perjury. 13) As and for additional spousal support, Husband shall pay a Smith/Ostler percentage for any and all income, compensation and/or remuneration available for support beyond the conservative gross base monthly income of $21,396 as set forth in the Smith/Ostler bonus table attached to the XSpouse report. Additional spousal support shall be paid within 10 days of receipt.
Husband shall provide documentation showing the excess gross income and calculation upon which the bonus is paid. 14) Husband owes Wife’s $7,974.21 in temporary base monthly spousal support arrears for the period of 5/14/26 – 6/30/26 ($2,824.21 for May + $5,150 for June). Husband shall pay this balance in full by 6/30/26. The parties shall meet and confer regarding whether Smith/Ostler bonus support arrears are also owed for this time period. 15) The Court reserves jurisdiction over this temporary spousal support order retroactive to 5/14/26.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
16) Husband’s request that Wife submit to a vocational evaluation is GRANTED. The parties shall meet and confer regarding selection of the vocational evaluator. Husband shall be responsible for all fees and costs associated with the vocational evaluation. 17) Wife’s counsel shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing and submit a judgment terminating marital status and reserving the Court’s jurisdiction over all other issues (with an FL- 347 that mirrors the terms of the FL-347 attached hereto). 18) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the proposed order after hearing directly to the court.
Failure to submit the order after hearing within 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d).
PETITIONER: RESPONDENT: ATTACHMENT TO The court grants the request of petitioner JUDGMENT (FL-180) respondent Date marital or domestic partnership status ends (specify): THE COURT FINDS dissolution of the status of the marriage or domestic partnership apart from other issues.
1. CASE NUMBER: BIFURCATION OF STATUS OF MARRIAGE OR DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP 2. THE COURT ORDERS 3. a. (1) (2) FINDINGS AND ORDER AFTER HEARING (FL-340) to bifurcate and grant a separate trial on the issue of the (3) b. Name of plan: Each retirement or pension plan of the parties has been joined as a party to the proceeding for dissolution unless joinder is precluded or made unnecessary by applicable law. Type of order attached 3a(1) 3a(2) 3a(3) FL-347 A final domestic relations order or qualified domestic relations order under Family Code section 2610 disposing of each party's interest in retirement plan benefits, including survivor and death benefits.
An interim order preserving the nonemployee party's right to retirement plan benefits, including survivor and death benefits, pending entry of judgment on all remaining issues. A provisional order on Pension Benefits—Attachment to Judgment (form FL-348) incorporated as an attachment to the judgment of dissolution of the status of marriage or domestic partnership (Judgment (Family Law) (form FL-180)). This order provisionally awards to each party a one-half interest in all retirement benefits attributable to employment during the marriage or domestic partnership.
A preliminary declaration of disclosure with a completed schedule of assets and debts and income and expense declaration has been served on the nonmoving party, or the parties have stipulated in writing to defer service of the preliminary declaration of disclosure until a later time. To preserve the claims of each party in all retirement plan benefits on entry of judgment granting a dissolution of the status of the marriage or domestic partnership, the court makes one of the following orders for each retirement plan in which either party is a participant: See attachment 3b for additional plans. c.
The moving party must promptly serve on the retirement or pension plan administrator a copy of any order entered under items a and b above and a copy of the judgment granting dissolution of the status of the marriage or domestic partnership (form FL-180). Jurisdiction is reserved for later determination of all other pending issues in this case.4.
5. The court makes the following additional orders as conditions for granting the severance on the issue of dissolution of the status of marriage or domestic partnership. In the case of the moving party's death, the order continues to be binding on that moving party's estate and will be enforceable against any asset, including the proceeds thereof, to the same extent that these obligations would have been enforceable before the person's death. Division of propertya. The petitioner respondent must indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any taxes, reassessments, interest, and penalties payable by the other party in connection with the division of the
community estate that would not have been payable if the parties were still married or domestic partners at the time the division was made. Form Adopted for Mandatory Use BIFURCATION OF STATUS OF MARRIAGE Family Code, §§ 2337, 2610; Judicial Council of California Probate Code, §§ 160 et seq., 5000 et seq. FL-347 [January 1, 2018] www.courts.ca.govOR DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP - ATTACHMENT (Family Law) /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn AMY KUBASAK ALTON FDI-25-801544 DIRK ALTON X X 6/23/26 /g3Petitioner's LPL Financial x365 X /g3Petitioner's LPL Financial x3479 Rollover IRA X /g3Respondent's Capital Group/American Funds x3866 IRA X X XX XX X Alton v.
Alton
FL-347 BIFURCATION OF STATUS OF MARRIAGEFL-347 [Rev. January 1, 2018] OR DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP - ATTACHMENT (Family Law) Health insurance5.b. Until judgment has been entered on all remaining issues and has become final, the must maintain all existing health and medical insurance coverage for the other party, and that party must also maintain any minor children as named dependents, as long as that party is eligible to do so. If at any time during this period the petitioner respondent petitioner respondent is not eligible to maintain that coverage, that party must, at his or her sole expense, provide and maintain health and medical insurance coverage that is comparable to the existing health and medical insurance coverage to the extent it is available. petitioner respondent is responsible for paying the health and medicalIf that coverage is not available, the care for the other party and the minor children to the extent that care would have been covered by the existing insurance coverage but for the dissolution of marital status or domestic partnership, and will otherwise indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any adverse consequences resulting from the loss or reduction of the existing coverage. "Health and medical insurance coverage" includes any coverage under any group or individual health or other medical plan, fund, policy, or program. c.
Probate homestead Until judgment has been entered on all remaining issues and has become final, the must indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any adverse consequences to the other party if the bifurcation results in a termination of the other party's right to a probate homestead in the residence in which the other party resides at the time the severance is granted. petitioner respondent d. petitioner respondentUntil judgment has been entered on all remaining issues and has become final, the must indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any adverse consequences to the other party if the bifurcation results in the loss of the rights of the other party to a probate family allowance as the surviving spouse or surviving domestic partner.
Probate family allowance e. Retirement benefits Except for any retirement plan, fund, or arrangement identified in any order issued and attached as set out in paragraph 3, until judgment has been entered on all remaining issues and has become final, the indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any adverse consequences to the other party if the bifurcation results in the loss of the other party's rights with respect to any retirement, survivor, or deferred compensation benefits under any plan, fund, or arrangement, or to any elections or options associated with them, to the extent that the other party would have been entitled to those benefits or elections as the spouse or surviving spouse or the domestic partner or surviving domestic partner of the moving party.
Social security benefitsf. The moving party must indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any adverse consequences if the bifurcation results in the loss of rights to social security benefits or elections to the extent the other party would have been entitled to those benefits or elections as the surviving spouse or surviving domestic partner of the moving party. Beneficiary designation - Nonprobate transferg. Attachment 5(g), Order Re: Beneficiary Designation for Nonprobate Transfer Assets, will remain in effect for each covered asset until the division of any community interest therein has been completed.
Individual Retirement Accountsh. Attachment 5(h), Order Re: Division of IRA Under Internal Revenue Code Section 408(d)(6), has been issued to preserve the ability of the IRA owner. petitioner respondent must petitioner respondent to defer distribution of his or her community interest on the death of
PETITIONER: RESPONDENT: CASE NUMBER: /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn/boxshadowdwn AMY KUBASAK ALTON FDI-25-801544 DIRK ALTON X X X X X X X X X X X Alton v. Alton
FL-347 FL-347 [Rev. January 1, 2018] (Family Law) BIFURCATION OF STATUS OF MARRIAGE OR DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP - ATTACHMENT
Enforcement of community property rights5.i. Good cause exists to make additional orders as set out in Family Code section 2337(c)(9). See Attachment 5(i). Other conditions that are just and equitablej. Other: 6. Number of pages attached: WARNING: Judgment (Family Law) (form FL-180) (status only) must be completed in addition to this form for the status of the marriage or domestic partnership to be ended. PETITIONER: RESPONDENT: CASE NUMBER: /boxshadowdwn /boxshadowdwn AMY KUBASAK ALTON FDI-25-801544 DIRK ALTON 0 Alton v. Alton
Xspouse 2026-1-CA Monthly Figures Husband Wife 0 0 0.00% 0.00% MFJIN MFJIN 1 2 0 0 21396 2458 950 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 1000 0 1481 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26-06-23 XSpouse Alton v. Alton 801544 2026 Fixed Shares Number of children Percent time with NCP Filing status Number of exemptions Wages and salary Self employed income Other taxable income TANF CS received Other nontaxable income New spouse income Employee 401-k contribution Adjustments to income SS paid prev marriage CS paid prev marriage Health insurance Other medical expenses Property tax expenses Ded interest expense Contribution deduction Misc tax deductions Qualified business income deduction Required union dues Mandatory retirement Hardship deduction Other GDL deductions Child care expenses 0 0 Monthly Figures 2026 GUIDELINE Nets (adjusted) Husband 14995 Wife 1696 Total 16691 Support Addons 0 Guideln CS 0 S.Clara SS 5150 Total 5150 - Settings changed Proposed Tactic 9 CS 0 SS 5150 Total 5150 Saving 0 Releases 0 Cash Flow Guideline Proposed Combined net spendable 16691 16691 Percent change 0% 0% Husband Payment cost/benefit -5150 -5150 Net spendable income 9845 9845 Change from guideline 0 0 % of combined spendable 59% 59% % of saving over guideline 0% 0% Total taxes 6251 6251 Dep. exemption value 0 0 # withholding allowances 0 0 Net wage paycheck 0 0 Wife Payment cost/benefit 5150 5150 Net spendable income 6846 6846 Change from guideline 0 0 % of combined spendable 41% 41% % of saving over guideline 0% 0% Total taxes 762 762 Dep. exemption value 0 0 # withholding allowances 0 0 Net wage paycheck 0 0 Husband pays Guideline SS, Proposed SS FC 4055 checking: ON Per Child Information DOB Timeshare cce(F) cce(M) Addons Payor Basic CS Payor Pres CS Payor All children 0 - 0 0 0 0 Husband 0 Husband 0 Husband Superior Court of California County of San Francisco
OFF Bonus amounts from: 0 to: 200000 Step: (0 = default steps) 500 Additional Cost to Husband Husband's Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 500 0.00 0 19.91 100 0 5250 1000 0.00 0 19.91 199 0 5349 1500 0.00 0 19.91 299 0 5449 2000 0.00 0 19.91 398 0 5548 2500 0.00 0 19.91 498 0 5648 3000 0.00 0 19.91 597 0 5747 3500 0.00 0 19.91 697 0 5847 4000 0.00 0 19.91 796 0 5947 4500 0.00 0 19.91 896 0 6046 5000 0.00 0 19.91 995 0 6146 5500 0.00 0 19.91 1095 0 6245 6000 0.00 0 19.91 1194 0 6345 6500 0.00 0 19.91 1294 0 6444 7000 0.00 0 19.90 1393 0 6544 7500 0.00 0 19.90 1493 0 6643 8000 0.00 0 19.90 1592 0 6743 8500 0.00 0 19.90 1692 0 6842 9000 0.00 0 19.90 1791 0 6942 9500 0.00 0 19.90 1891 0 7041 10000 0.00 0 19.90 1990 0 7141 10500 0.00 0 19.90 2090 0 7240 11000 0.00 0 19.90 2189 0 7339 11500 0.00 0 19.90 2289 0 7439 12000 0.00 0 19.90 2388 0 7538 12500 0.00 0 19.90 2488 0 7638 13000 0.00 0 19.90 2587 0 7737 13500 0.00 0 19.90 2687 0 7837 14000 0.00 0 19.90 2786 0 7936 14500 0.00 0 19.90 2886 0 8036 15000 0.00 0 19.90 2985 0 8135 15500 0.00 0 19.90 3084 0 8235 16000 0.00 0 19.90 3184 0 8334 16500 0.00 0 19.90 3283 0 8434 17000 0.00 0 19.90 3383 0 8533 17500 0.00 0 19.90 3482 0 8632 18000 0.00 0 19.90 3582 0 8732 18500 0.00 0 19.90 3681 0 8831 19000 0.00 0 19.90 3780 0 8931 19500 0.00 0 19.90 3880 0 9030 20000 0.00 0 19.90 3979 0 9130 Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse R = recipient of support Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Xspouse 2026-1-CA Superior Court of California County of San Francisco
OFF Bonus amounts from: 0 to: 200000 Step: (0 = default steps) 500 Additional Cost to Husband Husband's Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 20500 0.00 0 19.90 4079 0 9229 21000 0.00 0 19.90 4178 0 9328 21500 0.00 0 19.90 4278 0 9428 22000 0.00 0 19.90 4377 0 9527 22500 0.00 0 19.89 4476 0 9627 23000 0.00 0 19.89 4576 0 9726 23500 0.00 0 19.89 4675 0 9825 24000 0.00 0 19.89 4775 0 9925 24500 0.00 0 19.89 4874 0 10024 25000 0.00 0 19.89 4973 0 10124 25500 0.00 0 19.89 5073 0 10223 26000 0.00 0 19.89 5172 0 10322 26500 0.00 0 19.89 5271 0 10422 27000 0.00 0 19.89 5371 0 10521 27500 0.00 0 19.89 5470 0 10620 28000 0.00 0 19.89 5570 0 10720 28500 0.00 0 19.89 5669 0 10819 29000 0.00 0 19.89 5768 0 10919 29500 0.00 0 19.89 5868 0 11018 30000 0.00 0 19.89 5967 0 11117 30500 0.00 0 19.89 6066 0 11217 31000 0.00 0 19.89 6166 0 11316 31500 0.00 0 19.89 6265 0 11415 32000 0.00 0 19.89 6364 0 11515 32500 0.00 0 19.89 6464 0 11614 33000 0.00 0 19.89 6563 0 11713 33500 0.00 0 19.89 6662 0 11813 34000 0.00 0 19.89 6762 0 11912 34500 0.00 0 19.89 6861 0 12011 35000 0.00 0 19.89 6960 0 12111 35500 0.00 0 19.89 7060 0 12210 36000 0.00 0 19.89 7159 0 12309 36500 0.00 0 19.89 7258 0 12409 37000 0.00 0 19.89 7358 0 12508 37500 0.00 0 19.89 7457 0 12607 38000 0.00 0 19.89 7556 0 12707 38500 0.00 0 19.88 7656 0 12806 39000 0.00 0 19.88 7755 0 12905 39500 0.00 0 19.88 7854 0 13005 40000 0.00 0 19.88 7954 0 13104 40500 0.00 0 19.88 8053 0 13203 Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse R = recipient of support Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Xspouse 2026-1-CA Superior Court of California County of San Francisco
OFF Bonus amounts from: 0 to: 200000 Step: (0 = default steps) 500 Additional Cost to Husband Husband's Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 41000 0.00 0 19.88 8152 0 13302 41500 0.00 0 19.88 8251 0 13402 42000 0.00 0 19.88 8351 0 13501 42500 0.00 0 19.88 8450 0 13600 43000 0.00 0 19.88 8549 0 13700 43500 0.00 0 19.88 8649 0 13799 44000 0.00 0 19.88 8748 0 13898 44500 0.00 0 19.88 8847 0 13997 45000 0.00 0 19.88 8946 0 14097 45500 0.00 0 19.88 9046 0 14196 46000 0.00 0 19.88 9145 0 14295 46500 0.00 0 19.88 9244 0 14394 47000 0.00 0 19.88 9343 0 14494 47500 0.00 0 19.88 9443 0 14593 48000 0.00 0 19.88 9542 0 14692 48500 0.00 0 19.88 9641 0 14791 49000 0.00 0 19.88 9740 0 14891 49500 0.00 0 19.88 9840 0 14990 50000 0.00 0 19.88 9939 0 15089 50500 0.00 0 19.88 10038 0 15188 51000 0.00 0 19.88 10137 0 15288 51500 0.00 0 19.88 10237 0 15387 52000 0.00 0 19.88 10336 0 15486 52500 0.00 0 19.88 10435 0 15585 53000 0.00 0 19.88 10534 0 15684 53500 0.00 0 19.88 10633 0 15784 54000 0.00 0 19.88 10733 0 15883 54500 0.00 0 19.87 10832 0 15982 55000 0.00 0 19.87 10931 0 16081 55500 0.00 0 19.87 11030 0 16180 56000 0.00 0 19.87 11129 0 16280 56500 0.00 0 19.87 11229 0 16379 57000 0.00 0 19.87 11328 0 16478 57500 0.00 0 19.87 11427 0 16577 58000 0.00 0 19.87 11526 0 16676 58500 0.00 0 19.87 11625 0 16776 59000 0.00 0 19.87 11725 0 16875 59500 0.00 0 19.87 11824 0 16974 60000 0.00 0 19.87 11923 0 17073 60500 0.00 0 19.87 12022 0 17172 61000 0.00 0 19.87 12121 0 17271 Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse R = recipient of support Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Xspouse 2026-1-CA Superior Court of California County of San Francisco
OFF Bonus amounts from: 0 to: 200000 Step: (0 = default steps) 500 Additional Cost to Husband Husband's Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 61500 0.00 0 19.87 12220 0 17371 62000 0.00 0 19.87 12320 0 17470 62500 0.00 0 19.87 12419 0 17569 63000 0.00 0 19.87 12518 0 17668 63500 0.00 0 19.87 12617 0 17767 64000 0.00 0 19.87 12716 0 17866 64500 0.00 0 19.87 12815 0 17966 65000 0.00 0 19.87 12914 0 18065 65500 0.00 0 19.87 13014 0 18164 66000 0.00 0 19.87 13113 0 18263 66500 0.00 0 19.87 13212 0 18362 67000 0.00 0 19.87 13311 0 18461 67500 0.00 0 19.87 13410 0 18560 68000 0.00 0 19.87 13509 0 18660 68500 0.00 0 19.87 13608 0 18759 69000 0.00 0 19.87 13708 0 18858 69500 0.00 0 19.87 13807 0 18957 70000 0.00 0 19.87 13906 0 19056 70500 0.00 0 19.87 14005 0 19155 71000 0.00 0 19.86 14104 0 19254 71500 0.00 0 19.86 14203 0 19353 72000 0.00 0 19.86 14302 0 19452 72500 0.00 0 19.86 14401 0 19552 73000 0.00 0 19.86 14500 0 19651 73500 0.00 0 19.86 14599 0 19750 74000 0.00 0 19.86 14699 0 19849 74500 0.00 0 19.86 14798 0 19948 75000 0.00 0 19.86 14897 0 20047 75500 0.00 0 19.86 14996 0 20146 76000 0.00 0 19.86 15095 0 20245 76500 0.00 0 19.86 15194 0 20344 77000 0.00 0 19.86 15293 0 20443 77500 0.00 0 19.86 15392 0 20542 78000 0.00 0 19.86 15491 0 20641 78500 0.00 0 19.86 15590 0 20741 79000 0.00 0 19.86 15689 0 20840 79500 0.00 0 19.86 15788 0 20939 80000 0.00 0 19.86 15887 0 21038 80500 0.00 0 19.86 15987 0 21137 81000 0.00 0 19.86 16086 0 21236 81500 0.00 0 19.86 16185 0 21335 Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse R = recipient of support Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Xspouse 2026-1-CA Superior Court of California County of San Francisco
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”