Lachman, Lori v. McAlinn, Shawn
Status Conference
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 12/05/2025, 9:00 a.m. Department 3
Case No. FL0002199 Petitioner: Lachman, Lori Attorney: Sua, Brandon Respondent: McAlinn, Shawn Attorney: Gettys, Candence
1. Both parties are represented by an attorney. No appearance by parties or counsel is necessary at this Status Conference. The Court presumes that no further Status Conference is necessary at this time. The matter may be restored to the Status Conference at the request of either party or by notice from the Court.
2. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference.
__________________________________________________________________
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.