Rodriguez vs. Roline Express Inc.

cause of action to the Complaint, Plaintiff waited to file this motion until 4/14/2026 (five months later.) Yet, Attorney Trauben explains the delay in ¶ 6 of his declaration wherein he states that he resides in Pacific Palisades and the fire rendered his home uninhabitable to the extent that he had to relocate and significant time was spent on contractor coordination, temporary housing logistics, and family support. Additionally, both of his sons sustained injuries to their ACLs. While the Court certainly sympathizes with Mr.

Trauben, it is unclear why he would take the case given his personal situation. Also, it is unclear why someone else in the firm was incapable of filing this Motion. Nevertheless, no real prejudice exists. Trial is set for 11/9/2026. Defense counsel has been aware of the potential cause of action since April 2026. Defendant has had sufficient time to prepare any defense it may have to this cause of action (which is based on the same facts as the other causes of action). Furthermore, discovery is ongoing.

An IDC is set for July 2026. To the extent any prejudice exists to Defendant, it may be mitigated by briefly continuing the trial. Plaintiff to separately file the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff to give notice.

104 Rodriguez vs. Roline Express Inc.

25-01463168 1. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record x 3 2. Case Management Conference Cedric Severino (“Moving Attorney”) moves to be relieved as counsel of record for Roline Express, Inc., Andrea Albescu, and Lucian Boicu. The motions are unopposed and Moving Attorney has stated a basis for permissive withdrawal under the Rules

of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.16. All other requirements of the applicable California Rules of Court are satisfied. Accordingly, the motions are GRANTED. The orders relieving counsel will be effective upon counsel filing proof of service of a copy of the signed orders (MC-053) on the clients and on all parties that have appeared in the case. (California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(e). Moving Party to give notice.

105 Moslehi vs. County of Orange

24-01428581 Motion to Dismiss Defendants Baker Ranch Affordable, L.P and Solari Enterprises, Inc. (“Defendants”) moves to dismiss this action brought by Plaintiff Arah Moslehi with prejudice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 581(f)(2), 588, and 1005(13) on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint following the Court’s 10/21/2025 Minute Order sustaining Defendants’ demurrer with leave to amend. The motion is unopposed. Code of Civil Procedure section 581(f)(2) states that the “court may dismiss the complaint as to that defendant when . . . [e]xcept where Section 597 applies, after a demurrer to the complaint is sustained with leave to amend, the plaintiff fails to amend it within the time allowed by the court and either party moves for dismissal.” (Code Civ.