Motion to Dismiss
of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.16. All other requirements of the applicable California Rules of Court are satisfied. Accordingly, the motions are GRANTED. The orders relieving counsel will be effective upon counsel filing proof of service of a copy of the signed orders (MC-053) on the clients and on all parties that have appeared in the case. (California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(e). Moving Party to give notice.
105 Moslehi vs. County of Orange
24-01428581 Motion to Dismiss Defendants Baker Ranch Affordable, L.P and Solari Enterprises, Inc. (“Defendants”) moves to dismiss this action brought by Plaintiff Arah Moslehi with prejudice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 581(f)(2), 588, and 1005(13) on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint following the Court’s 10/21/2025 Minute Order sustaining Defendants’ demurrer with leave to amend. The motion is unopposed. Code of Civil Procedure section 581(f)(2) states that the “court may dismiss the complaint as to that defendant when . . . [e]xcept where Section 597 applies, after a demurrer to the complaint is sustained with leave to amend, the plaintiff fails to amend it within the time allowed by the court and either party moves for dismissal.” (Code Civ.
Proc., § 581, subd. (f)(2).) California Rules of Court, rule 3.1320(g) states: “Following a ruling on a demurrer, unless otherwise ordered, leave to answer or amend within 10 days is deemed granted, except for actions in forcible entry,
forcible detainer, or unlawful detainer in which case 5 calendar days is deemed granted.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1320, subd. (g).) Here, the Court sustained Defendant’s demurrer to Plaintiff Arah Moslehi’s complaint with leave to amend on 10/21/2025. (ROA 99.) On 10/22/2025, Defendants filed and served a Notice of Ruling wherein Defendants advised Plaintiff that the Court sustained Defendants’ demurrer to the Complaint with leave to amend. (ROAs 103 and 105.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.
Plaintiff’s deadline to do so passed. 10 days after Defendants served notice of the Court’s ruling on their demurrer is Saturday, 11/01/2025. Again, to date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. As such, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff Arah Moslehi’s Complaint is deemed DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendants Baker Ranch Affordable, L.P and Solari Enterprises, Inc. The requests for judicial notices are GRANTED. “A court may take judicial notice of the [e]xistence of each document in a court file but can only take judicial notice of the truth of facts asserted in documents such as orders, findings of fact and conclusions of law, and judgments.” (People v.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Franklin (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261, 280.) Moving parties to give notice.
106 Rebel Off Road LLC vs. Diaz
25-01503796 Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default Plaintiffs REBEL OFF ROAD LLC, BOND GILMER, RANDUN SANTOYO, and AMADOR SANTOYO will and hereby does move this Court for an order