In The Matter of Liliane Cossette Blumberg
PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Cross-Defendants 25 Executive, LLC, Jeremy Sill, and Jesse Van Coutren (collectively, “Cross-Defendants”) demur, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.10, subdivisions (e) and (f), and move to strike, pursuant to sections 435 and 436, subdivision (a), to the Cross- Complaint of Julie Nguyen (“Cross-Complainant”).
“A party may amend its pleading once without leave of the court at any time . . . after a demurrer or motion to strike is filed but before the demurrer or motion to strike is heard if the amended pleading is filed and served no later than the date for filing an opposition to the demurrer or motion to strike.” (§ 472, subd. (a).)
Cross-Complainant filed a First Amended Cross-Complaint (“FACC”) prior to the date on which an opposition to the present demurrer and motion was due. There is no proof of service of the FACC appearing in the Court’s file. Presuming, however, that the FACC was timely served, the issues raised by the present demurrer and motion are MOOT.
In The Matter of Sang Cong Truong 26CV000398
PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME
TENTATIVE RULING: Notice has been properly published and no written objections have been filed. The petition is GRANTED without need for appearance.
In The Matter of Liliane Cossette Blumberg 26CV000630
PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME
TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to June 09, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A to allow Petitioner to remedy the following issue: the Petition is not signed and verified.
Petitioner is directed to file an amended petition, which is signed and verified.
In The Matter of Wyatt Steven Lang 26CV000718
PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME
TENTATIVE RULING: An Order to Show Cause for Change of Name (OSC) was entered in this matter on April 03, 2026. Petitioner is required to publish the OSC in the manner set forth in Code of Civil Procedure, section 1277. However, there is no proof of publication (POP) in the Court’s file. If one is filed before the hearing, the petition will be GRANTED without need for appearance.
4
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.