DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26-63772·napa·Civil·Trust Administration
GRANTED

In The Matter of James C. Metzger Trust

THIRTEENTH ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF TRUSTEE AND PETITION FOR SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNT AND APPROVAL OF TRUSTEE FEES

Hearing date
May 8, 2026
Department
A
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Petition

Ruling

Conservatorship of Spencer Lewis Rollins 24PR000199

REVIEW HEARING

APPEARANCE REQUIRED.

In The Matter of The Patsy Charles Mallman Family Trust 25PR000268

PETITION FOR INSTRUCTION TO SELL CONSERVATEE’S RESIDENCE

TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED.

In The Matter of James C. Metzger Trust 26-63772

THIRTEENTH ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF TRUSTEE AND PETITION FOR SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNT AND APPROVAL OF TRUSTEE FEES

TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed.

The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing.

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

American Express National Bank et al v. Howard Milstein 23CV000450

MOTION FOR ENTERING JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO DEFENDANT’S DEFAULT UNDER SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file and serve a Proposed Judgment no later than May 14, 2026.

The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share