In the Matter of Turkington Bypass Trust
FOURTEENTH ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF TRUSTEES; PETITION FOR SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNT; AND FOR APPROVAL OF TRUSTEES’ FEES
Motion type
Ruling
PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Conservatorship of Eliazar Lopez Becerra 23PR000019
REVIEW HEARING
TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the case is set for a Review - Biennial hearing on May 09, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
Based on the report of the court investigator, the Court determines by clear and convincing evidence that the Conservatee can communicate a desire to participate in the voting process, and therefore orders the Conservatee’s right to register to vote shall be restored, pursuant to Elections Code section 2209, subdivision (b).
Conservatorship of Coad, Alex Michael (G) 26-22489
REVIEW HEARING
TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial hearing on May 09, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
In the Matter of Turkington Bypass Trust 26-61271
FOURTEENTH ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF TRUSTEES; PETITION FOR SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNT; AND FOR APPROVAL OF TRUSTEES’ FEES
TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed.
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Jakeila Dotson v. Napa Valley Unified School District et al 25CV000969
DEFENDANT NAPA VALLEY UNIFIEED SCHOOL DISTRICT’S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
TENTATIVE RULING: The demurrer is OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part. The demurrer is OVERRULED as to: (1) the Fourth Cause of Action for Negligent
4
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.