Child's passport and travel bond waiver
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 June 18, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
9. RENTACHINTALA SAHITHI V. PAVAN SRIKONDA PFL20190068
On March 17, 2026, Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking orders regarding the child’s passport and a travel bond waiver. This is a post-judgment RFO and as such, personal service of the moving papers would generally be required. However, on April 10th the court made an ex parte order authorizing electronic service. In accordance with that order, the RFO was electronically served on April 17, 2026, however Petitioner failed to serve a blank Responsive Declaration to Request for Order and the Notice of Tentative Ruling.
This matter is dropped from calendar due to lack of proper service.
TENTATIVE RULING #9: THIS MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO LACK OF PROPER SERVICE.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”