DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26-28912·napa·Civil·Conservatorship
Matter set for review hearing in two years.

Conservatorship of Whitney Malone

Review hearing

Hearing date
May 7, 2026
Department
Dept. A
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 9, 2028
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Other

Parties

RespondentWhitney Malone

Ruling

Estate of Nancy Jo Solario 25PR000060

STATUS HEARING RE: FINAL DISTRIBUTION

TENTATIVE RULING: In light of the June 02, 2026, hearing on a Petition to approve accounting, set by the Administrator, the present status hearing is MOOT.

Conservatorship of Whitney Malone 26-28912

REVIEW HEARING

TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Co- Conservators are acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on May 09, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Desiree Vasquez v. Your Home Nursing Services, Inc. 22CV000508

CASE REVIEW HEARING RE: FINAL ACCOUNTING AND DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL FUNDS

APPEARANCE REQUIRED.

**at 9:30 a.m.** American Express National Bank v. William Versaci 25CV000472

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is GRANTED.

Plaintiff American Express National Bank moves, pursuant Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, for an order entering summary adjudication in favor of plaintiff and against

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share