DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
21PR000283·napa·Civil·Trust Administration
MOOT

In the Matter of Irrevocable Special Needs Trust For Jamie J. Cooper

Accounting hearing

Hearing date
May 7, 2026
Department
Dept. B
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Other

Parties

PetitionerJamie J. Cooper

Ruling

Court concludes that the term “ESTATE” in Section 1(b) of the Petition is a scrivener’s error. If this is not the case, Petitioner shall appear to inform the Court of the true nature of the Petition.

Conservatorship of Ryli F. Shaffner 21PR000065

REVIEW HEARING

TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Co-conservators are acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the case is set for a Review - Biennial hearing in two years, on May 09, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

Estate of Judith M. Franzi Price 21PR000119

REVIEW HEARING: STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION

APPEARANCE REQUIRED: On November 7, 2025, the Court ordered Petitioner to file a Status Report prior to this date. The status report was to focus on efforts taken, and results obtained, between then and May 07, 2026, in selling the remaining real properties and should provide an estimate for closing the estate. Petitioner has filed nothing since that date and therefore, is ordered to appear to update the Court on the status of the case.

In the Matter of Irrevocable Special Needs Trust 21PR000283 For Jamie J. Cooper, Dated June 30, 2009

ACCOUNTING HEARING

TENTATIVE RULING: On April 09, 2026, Trustees filed a Petition to Approve Second Accounting and set the matter for hearing on July 24, 2026. The instant hearing is, therefore, MOOT.

Conservatorship of Paul L Geoffrion 24PR000135

FIFTH ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF CONSERVATOR OF THE ESTATE AND PETITION FOR ITS SETTLEMENT; PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT FEES, CONSERVATOR’S FEES AND ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS; PETITION TO REDUCE BOND; AND PETITION TO INCREASE ALLOWANCE

4

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share