DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26PR000070·napa·Civil·Conservatorship
CONTINUED

Conservatorship of Earl Dean Pairett

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE

Hearing date
May 5, 2026
Department
A
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 2, 2026

Motion type

Petition

Parties

OtherEarl Dean Pairett

Ruling

appear and object to the petition orally or in writing at the hearing. (See Prob. Code § 1043.) If there are no objections, the Court is inclined to grant the Petition.

Conservatorship of Marvin M Braun 26PR000042

REVIEW HEARING – CONFIRM CONSERVATEE CONSENTS TO PREVIOUS ORDERS

APPEARANCE REQUIRED

Conservatorship of Merrily Wilkinson 26PR000046

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON

APPEARANCE REQUIRED. By Minute Order of April 07, 2026, the matter was continued to allow Petitioner to file a Confidential Capacity Assessment and Declaration (Judicial Counsel form GC-335). There is still no GC-335. Counsel for Petitioner shall appear to inform the Court regarding the status of the GC-335.

Conservatorship of Earl Dean Pairett 26PR000070

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE

TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to June 02, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A to permit Petitioner to provide sufficient Notice of Hearing to Cindy Johnson Mederios. The proof of service on Ms. Johnson Mederios indicates insufficient notice pursuant to Probate Code section 1461.5.

The Order Appointing Temporary Conservator is hereby modified to expire on the continued hearing date.

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Genevieve Welsh v. Thomas Brown et al 22CV000460

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DUE TO UNAVAILABILITY OF PARTY

APPEARANCE REQUIRED: The motion is GRANTED. The Court is willing to add the matter to its trial calendar beginning any of the weeks of September 21, September 28, October 5, or October 12. Counsel are directed to meet and confer to select from these dates. The Court will reset the matter at the hearing. 3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share