Bank of America N.A. v. Kristen Rose Sass
MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL AND ENTER JUDGMENT UNDER TERMS OF STIPULATED SETTLEMENT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
The Court notes that it is currently setting matters for trial in May – June of 2027. The Court further takes judicial notice of the fact that Welsh v. Brown is set to proceed to trial in September or October of 2026. The Court finds from the foregoing, that the timing of the resolution of those issues in Welsh v. Brown that are material to Plaintiff’s claims here, no longer constitutes grounds for prohibiting the parties in this action from proceeding with discovery.
Based on the foregoing, the motion is GRANTED. However, the Court defers setting the matter for trial to the Case Management Conference set for July 22, 2026.
Bank of America N.A. v. Kristen Rose Sass 24CV000269
MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL AND ENTER JUDGMENT UNDER TERMS OF STIPULATED SETTLEMENT
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is GRANTED.
Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. moves, pursuant to Code of Civil procedure 664.6, for an order to vacate the dismissal and for entry of judgment under terms of the stipulated settlement.
Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been filed, the Motion is GRANTED.
John Michael Cole et al v. The Testate and Intestate 25CV000177 Successors of Paula Von Duering, Deceased et al
[1] CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
In light of the rulings below, the Court continues the Case Management Conference in this matter to August 5, 2026, 8:30 am in Department B.
[2] MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULTS AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are granted 15 Court days leave to file a Second Amended Complaint in substantially the same form as that attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of John H. Heffner.
Plaintiffs John Michael Cole and Anna Janae Cole, as Trustees of the Cole Family Trust Dated December 29, 2004, move, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 473, subdivision (a)(1) and 473, subdivision (d), for an order setting aside all defaults entered against defendants in the action, and granting Plaintiffs leave to file the proposed Second Amended Complaint.
Good cause appearing, and no opposition having been filed, the Motion is GRANTED.
5
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.