Manuel Del Arroz v. Gregory Hoffman et al
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 4TH AMENDED COMPLAINT
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
TENTATIVE RULINGS
FOR: May 01, 2026
If you do not see a tentative ruling for a scheduled matter, then attendance at the hearing is required.
Remote appearances via Zoom are optional. Please use Zoom at the links listed below.
If you have cases scheduled in both courtrooms at the same time, first log-in to the Zoom session for the department that has your quickest matter(s), and upon check-in, ask the clerk to email the clerk in the other department to advise that you will be late to the other Zoom session.
Dept. A Zoom Join by Video (Preferred) https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1601453113?pwd=XpBIIa8kBiCpGb0ukQyabkmCrgDdWM.1 Join by Phone: 833 568 8864 or 833 435 1820 Meeting ID: 160 145 3113 Password: 704959
Dept. 6 Zoom Join by Video (Preferred) https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1611412615?pwd=CVuzAdEmMJNjcWp0iWBmt1blRNHvyP.1 Join by Phone: 833 568 8864 or 833 435 1820 Meeting ID: 161 141 2615 Password: 649401
Court Reporting Services – The Court does not provide official court reporters in proceedings for which such services are not legally mandated. Parties are responsible for either making the appropriate request in advance or arranging for their own private court reporter. Go to http://napacountybar.org/court-reporting-services/ for information about local private court reporters. Attorneys or parties must confer with each other to avoid having more than one court reporter present for the same hearing.
“Recording Court proceedings (whether by Zoom’s AI Meeting Summary functionality or by any other means) is PROHIBITED without express permission from a judicial officer. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 1.150(c) & (d))
** All matters originally set in Dept. B will be heard in Dept. A **
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Manuel Del Arroz v. Gregory Hoffman et al 21CV000218
[1] PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 4TH AMENDED COMPLAINT
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
1
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.