[Parties’ names withheld]
Court Trial
Motion type
Ruling
breach of contract and breach of implied contract. The burden shifts to Defendant to show the existence of one or more triable issues of material fact. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(1).) By not opposing the motion, Defendant has failed to meet her burden.
Judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant Danielle Ramey. The Court will sign the proposed order and proposed judgment lodged with the moving papers.
26CV-01176 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]
Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer
Appearance required.
26CV-01804 [Parties’ names withheld pursuant to CCP § 1161.2(a)(1)]
Court Trial: Unlawful Detainer
Appearance required.
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.