DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
PR0001761·marin·Probate·Probate
Absent objections, this Petition will be granted without hearing.

IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES ANDREW KEPPEL

Petition for Letters of Administration

Hearing date
May 14, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Sep 24, 2026

Motion type

Petition

Parties

PetitionerJoshua Bernard Keppel

Ruling

PR0001761 IN THE MATTER OF CHARLES ANDREW KEPPEL

Petition for Letters of Administration, filed by Joshua Bernard Keppel on 5/14/26.

Ruling. Absent objections, this Petition will be granted without hearing. Petitioner is ordered to comply with the following future dates: 1. Final Inventory and Appraisal. a. A status hearing for the filing of the Final Inventory and Appraisal shall be set on September 24, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. (Prob. Code, § 8800.) b. An appearance will be required on that date if the Final Inventory and Appraisal is not filed at least five court days prior to hearing. (Super. Ct. Marin County, Local Rules, rule 6.2(b), Filing, Hearing, and Continuance Procedures.)

2. Status on Closing Estate. a. Either: (1) a Petition for Final Distribution; or (2) a Report on Status of Administration shall be filed by May 13, 2027, as required by Probate Code sections 12200 and 12201. b. A status hearing re filing the Petition or Report shall be set on June 3, 2027, at 10:00 a.m. i. If neither document has been timely filed, an appearance will be required. ii. If the Petition or Report is timely filed, the hearing will be set on June 3, 2027, at 9:00 a.m.

PRO1401401 LILYON BLANCHE TONKOFF, ESTATE OF

Fifth and Final Account and Report of Trustee of Testamentary Trust; Petition for Approval and Settlement of Fifth Account, for Allowance of Trustee’s Fees and Her Attorney’s Fees, for Final Distribution, for Retention of Reserve, and for Decrease of Bond, filed by Kim Schwarcz on 3/24/26.

Ruling. Absent objections, this Petition will be granted without hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share