DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
FL0002618·marin·FamilyLaw·Child Custody/Support
GRANTED in part

Eun Mi Yanez v. Aythami Yanez

Request for Order – Child Custody/Visitation

Hearing date
May 12, 2026
Department
G
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Next hearing
Jun 30, 2026

Motion type

Other

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,000$1,000

Parties

PetitionerEun Mi Yanez
RespondentAythami Yanez

Ruling

Petitioner Eun Yanez (Mother) filed a request for order (RFO) on April 1, 2026, seeking sole legal and physical custody and spousal and child support.

Father did not file financial documents as required by Local Rule 7 and did not file an opposition to the RFO. The parties met with Family Court Services (FCS) and reached a mediated agreement, which Mother later decided she was not comfortable with.

The Court finds it is in the best interests of the child to follow the FCS recommendation. The Court awards joint legal and physical custody. Siena will mostly reside with Mother and spend alternate weekends with Father on such schedule as is mutually agreed on by the parents. The parents shall cooperate to allow additional visitation that works for Father and Siena’s schedule.

The Court awards temporary family support in the amount of $2,000 per month, $1,000 payable on the first of the month and $1,000 on the 15th of every month, effective April 1, 2026. The matter is continued until June 30, 2026, for further hearing and Father must file his Rule 7 documents by May 31, 2026. The Court reserves jurisdiction retroactively to April 1, 2026 on both child and pendente lite spousal support.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share