Doesekle v. Meganova LP
Petitions to Compromise Minors’ Claims
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
(29) Tentative Ruling
Re: Doesekle v. Meganova LP Superior Court Case No. 23CECG02849
Hearing Date: May 12, 2026 (Dept. 503)
Motions (x3): Petitions to Compromise Minors’ Claims
If oral argument is timely requested, it will be entertained on Tuesday, May 26, 2026, at 3:30 p.m. in Department 503.
To continue to Wednesday, June 3, 2026, to enable petitioner to correct the defect set forth below.
Explanation:
The petitioner is listed as “Jenny Copeland” throughout each petition, however the petitions have been signed by a “Jenny Morris”. The court will continue the hearing on this matter to allow petitioner to address this inconsistency.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: JS on 5/11/2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date)
3
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.