MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
Carpenter & Zuckerman, LLP v. Cohen (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 373, 375.)
01426688 Sanburg - TENTATIVE RULING Trust Case: Sanburg - Trust 01426688
Calendar No.: 8
Date: 06/17/2026
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (ROA 158)
Petitioner Paula Sanburg Ruby (“Petitioner”), in propria persona, moves for leave to file a Third Amended Petition to add “Phil Kerbis, as co-successor trustee” as a Respondent in this case.
This motion came before the court on 4/15/26 at which time it was continued for compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1324. Instead of filing a declaration that complies with Rule 3.1324 and attaching a copy of the Proposed Third Amended Petition to the declaration, Petitioner filed a new motion for leave to amend (ROA 243) along with a compliant declaration (ROA 244). Petitioner also filed the Proposed Third Amended Petition. (ROA 245.) This subsequently filed motion has been set for hearing on 9/2/26. The court understands that these newly filed documents were intended to be supplements to the initially filed motion for leave to amend.
Counsel has now fully complied with Rule 3.1324. The motion is GRANTED.
Petitioner shall file the Third Amended Petition within 10 days of this ruling. The Third Amended Petition shall be identical in content to the Proposed Third Amended Petition filed by Petitioner on 5/12/16. (ROA 245.)
The motion for leave to amend set for 9/2/26 is VACATED.
01451379 Keane – Trust TENTATIVE RULING
Case: Keane – Trust 01451379
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”