Kiani vs. Koffey

2. Initiating contact, or soliciting, any person or business entity doing or having done business with Plaintiff, during the time of Defendant’s employment with Plaintiff. This does not preclude contact initiated by customers or former customers, nor preclude response by defendant to contact initiated by customers or former customers.

3. Directly or indirectly altering, destroying, or disposing of any evidence, in any form, relating to this action, including without limitation, emails and paper and electronic documents, including current or archived electronic logs, metadata, and directories.

Plaintiff’s remaining requests for injunctive relief are DENIED. The other requested relief is mandatory in nature without a showing of necessity, and/or duplicative of the relief already ordered above. (See Daly v. San Bernardino County Bd. of Supervisors (2021) 11 Cal.5th 1030, 1041 [prohibitory injunction “operates to preserve the status quo, while mandatory injunction “commands some change in the parties' positions”]; Teachers Ins. & Annuity Assn. v. Furlotti (1999) 70 Cal.App.4 th 1487, 1493 [“The granting of a mandatory injunction pending trial is not permitted except in extreme cases where the right thereto is clearly established”].)

The preliminary injunction shall issue upon Plaintiff posting a bond within seven calendar days after the hearing, and shall remain in effect during the pendency of this litigation, and/or until further order of the court.

Case Management Conference set this date is vacated.

Jury Trial set for July 26, 2027 at 8:30 a.m. in Department C44.

Moving party shall give notice.

3 Frey Environmental, Inc vs. Frietas

2025-01458158 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Continued to 8/20/26. See minute order dated 6/16/26. 4 Kiani vs. Koffey

2025-01484637 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

No tentative.

5 Maaranu vs. Ponder Motion to Compel Arbitration by Defendants Darnell Ponder, et. al