DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26PR0084·eldorado·Civil·Probate
CONTINUED

Estate of Campbell

Letters of Administration

Hearing date
May 18, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 29, 2026

Motion type

Petition

Monetary amounts referenced

$71,350

Ruling

MAY 18, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

9. 26PR0084 ESTATE OF CAMPBELL Letters of Administration

Decedent died intestate, survived by two adult children and two adult grandchildren. The Petition does not include decedent’s date or place of death. The Petition requests full authority under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. The Petition indicates that Petitioner is a person entitled to Letters but does not indicate Petitioner’s basis for priority or relationship to decedent. The address for one of decedent’s grandchildren is indicated as “unknown.” It is unclear whether any efforts to obtain her address have been made. The Petition requests that bond be fixed. Bond has been obtained in the amount of $71,350. A Duties/Liabilities statement (DE 147/DE 147s) was filed on March 25, 2026. There is no proof of service of notice of the Petition on file with the court, as required by Probate Code § 8110. There is no proof of publication on file with the court, as required by Probate Code §§ 8120, 8121. TENTATIVE RULING #9: HEARING CONTINUED TO MONDAY, JUNE 29, 2026, AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT NINE TO ALLOW PETITIONER TIME TO CURE THE ABOVEMENTIONED DEFECTS. IF A PARTY OR PARTIES WISH TO APPEAR REMOTELY, INSTRUCTIONS FOR REMOTE APPEARANCES CAN BE FOUND ON THE COURT’S WEBSITE.

13

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share