Travis Baskins v. Destinee Baskins
Ex parte application for emergency custody; Request for Order (RFO)
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 May 14, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
11. TRAVIS BASKINS V. DESTINEE BASKINS PFL20200285
Respondent filed an ex parte application for emergency custody orders on April 15, 2026. On April 17, 2026, the court granted Respondent temporary sole physical custody of the minors until Petitioner cleared his outstanding criminal warrants. The court referred the parties to an emergency set Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) appointment on April 28, 2026 and set a review hearing for May 14, 2026. Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO) on April 17th, making the same requests as set forth in the ex parte application. There is no Proof of Service showing Petitioner was properly served.
Nevertheless, both parties appeared at the CCRC appointment and reached a full agreement. The parties submitted a stipulation, which the court adopted as its order on May 6, 2026.
The court drops the matter from calendar based on the parties’ stipulation. All prior orders remain in full force and effect.
TENTATIVE RULING #11: THE MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR. ALL PRIOR ORDERS REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.