DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26FL0013·eldorado·Civil·Custody and Visitation
Matter dropped from calendar

Michael Bunio v. Christine McKay

Request for Order (RFO) regarding child custody

Hearing date
May 14, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Other

Parties

PetitionerMichael Bunio
RespondentChristine McKay

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 May 14, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

12. MICHAEL BUNIO V. CHRISTINE MCKAY 26FL0013

Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) on February 17, 2026, seeking child custody and parenting plan orders. The parties were referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) with an appointment on March 18, 2026 and a review hearing on May 14, 2026. There is no Proof of Service showing Respondent was properly served.

Both parties appeared at CCRC and requested the CCRC appointment and the review hearing be vacated.

The court drops the matter from calendar due to the lack of proper service as well as the parties’ request.

TENTATIVE RULING #12: THE MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO THE LACK OF PROPER SERVICE AS WELL AS THE PARTIES’ REQUEST.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share