DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
25CV1857·eldorado·Civil·Enforcement
APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED

EL DORADO COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES vs. WEBB ET AL

Enforcement Hearing

Hearing date
May 8, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffEL DORADO COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES
DefendantWEBB

Ruling

APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 8:30 A.M. ON FRIDAY, MAY, 8, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6551 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CA L. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPO N WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; EL DORADO COUNTY LOCAL RULE 8.05.07. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRI OR TO OR AT THE HEARING. LONG CAUSE HEARINGS MUST BE REQUESTED BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED AND THE PARTIES ARE TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. LONG CAUSE ORAL ARGUMEN T REQUESTS WILL BE SET FOR HEARING ON ONE OF THE THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DA TES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. THE COURT WILL ADVISE THE PARTIES OF THE L ONG CAUSE HEARING DATE AND TIME BY 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISS UED. PARTIES MAY PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE HEARING. May 8, 2026 Dept. 9 Tentative Rulings 16

11. 25CV1835 EL DORADO COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES vs. WEBB ET AL Enforcement Hearing At the previous hearing on April 3, 2026, the Court ordered Defendant to allow Animal Services to conduct an inspection within 15 days and continued the matter to allow Defendant to provide proof of compliance. TENTATIVE RULING #11: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 8:30 A.M. ON FRIDAY, MAY, 8, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT NINE.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share