1140 HARRISON ASSOCIATES LP VS. SHAVON BUTLER ET AL

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681510 - June 17, 2026 Hearing date: June 17, 2026 Case number: CUD26681510 Case title: 1140 HARRISON ASSOCIATES LP VS. SHAVON BUTLER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681510 | Case Title: | | 1140 HARRISON ASSOCIATES LP VS. SHAVON BUTLER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Set Case For Trial; Motion For Trial Preference (Ccp 369(E)); And Motion For Monetary And Issue Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 17, 2026. Line 12.

DEFENDANT SHAVON BUTLER Motion To Set Case For Trial; Motion For Trial Preference (Ccp 369(E)); And Motion For Monetary And Issue Sanctions is DENIED, as follows:

Motion to set case for trial is DENIED because a motion is not the proper procedure to set this case for trial. Defendant is directed to serve and file and serve a Request to Set Case for Trial-Unlawful Detainer, Judicial Council Form UD-150. The filing of this form is mandatory to set this case for trial. The Court notes that while Defendant filed a proof of service on May 14, 2026, indicating that a UD-150 form was served on Plaintiff's counsel, it does not appear this UD-150 form has been filed with the Court.

Motion for trial setting preference under CCP 36(e) is DENIED without prejudice. In the moving papers, Defendant variously asks for trial to be set within 120 days and within 7 days. It is unclear to the Court which Defendant is requesting. To the extent Defendant requests that trial be set within 120 days, preference should not be necessary for this requests as this is an unlawful detainer action which is already entitled to preferential setting upon the filing of a proper UD-150 form. To the extent Defendant requests that trial be set within 7 days, the showing offered by Defendant at this time does not satisfy the Court that setting this action for trial on this short of time will serve the interests of justice.

Motion for sanctions in connection with discovery is DENIED without prejudice. No proof of service of the discovery at issue has been provided.

This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge =(505/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |