Brian Cambridge v. Jordan Fierro

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 April 30, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM

3. BRIAN CAMBRIDGE V. JORDAN FIERRO 25FL0981

On February 10, 2026, Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking child support orders, custody and visitation orders, property orders and an order for attorney’s fees. He filed his Income and Expense Declaration concurrently therewith. He filed an Amended Request for Order on February 13th. All required documents were personally served on February 17th.

Respondent filed a Responsive Declaration to Request for Order and an Income and Expense Declaration on April 16th. Respondent filed another Responsive Declaration to Request for Order on April 17th. There is a Proof of Service filed April 16th for “Respondent’s Declaration,” it is unclear which, if either, of the responsive declarations was actually served.

Petitioner filed and served an updated Income and Expense Declaration on April 21st.

The parties are ordered to appear for the hearing to address which, if either, of Respondent’s responsive declarations was served and can be considered by the court.

TENTATIVE RULING #3: THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING TO ADDRESS WHICH, IF EITHER, OF RESPONDENT’S RESPONSIVE DECLARATIONS WAS SERVED AND CAN BE CONSIDERED BY THE COURT.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.