DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
25PR0340·eldorado·Civil·Letters of Administration
GRANTED

ESTATE OF BURGETT

Petition for Letters of Administration

Hearing date
Apr 27, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Apr 26, 2027

Motion type

Petition

Parties

PetitionerMichael Glass
PetitionerClara Acuna
OtherWilliam Boyd

Ruling

APRIL 27, 2026 Dept. 9 Probate Tentative Rulings

5. 25PR0340 ESTATE OF BURGETT Letters of Administration

Michael Glass filed a Petition for Letters of Administration, which was heard on March 2, 2026. There were several deficiencies identified by the Court.

Thereafter, Clara Acuna filed a Petition for Letters of Administration and an Objection to Glass’ Petition. Acuna objects based on the deficiencies identified by the Court in the Petition filed by Glass; she also objects based on lack of relationship between Glass and Decedent. Acuna is decedent’s daughter and has priority under Probate Code § 8461. Decedent died intestate on February 12, 2024, survived by three adult children. Petitioner is decedent’s daughter. The Petition requests full authority under the Independent Administration of Estates Act. Waivers of bond have been filed with the court by the heirs, attached to the Petition. A Duties/Liabilities statement (DE 147/DE 147s) was filed on March 19, 2026. Proof of service of notice of the hearing on the Petition was filed on March 19, 2026. William Boyd filed a request for special notice and his counsel received notice of this hearing. Proof of publication was filed on April 17, 2026. TENTATIVE RULING #5: BASED ON HER PRIORITY APPOINTMENT AND ABSENT FURTHER OBJECTION THE PETITION OF CLARA ACUNA IS GRANTED AS REQUESTED. ANY PERSON WHO HAS AN OBJECTION MAY MAKE IT ANY TIME, EVEN ORALLY AT THE HEARING (PROBATE CODE § 1043). A STATUS OF ADMINISTRATION HEARING IS SET FOR 8:30 A.M. ON MONDAY, APRIL 26, 2027, IN DEPARTMENT NINE. PETITIONER OR COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PERSONALLY APPEAR, OR FILE A STATUS UPDATE WITH THE COURT AT LEAST TWO WEEKS BEFORE THAT HEARING.

IF A PARTY OR PARTIES WISH TO APPEAR REMOTELY, INSTRUCTIONS FOR REMOTE APPEARANCES CAN BE FOUND ON THE COURT’S WEBSITE.

5

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share