DUTTA v. TESLA
Motion for Preliminary Injunction
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
April 17, 2026 Dept. 9 Tentative Rulings
5. 25CV2768 DUTTA v. TESLA Motion for Preliminary Injunction
Plaintiff filed a Petition for Court Appointment of an Arbitrator or, in the alternative, for a Preliminary Injunction. Defendant agrees that the Court should follow the procedures of Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §1281.6 to appoint a new arbitrator. Therefore, the Court will proceed under CCP § 1281.6 and it is unnecessary to address Plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction.
Under § 1281.6, “When a petition is made to the court to appoint a neutral arbitrator, the court shall nominate five persons from lists of persons supplied jointly by the parties to the arbitration or obtained from a governmental agency concerned with arbitration or private disinterested association concerned with arbitration.”
The Court hereby orders Defendant to obtain from AAA a list of arbitrators to present to the Court at this hearing. If this cannot be accomplished prior to the hearing, then the April 17, 2025, hearing will be used to select a new hearing date or timeline for compliance. The Court will use the list from AAA to nominate five people, and if the parties do not agree on an arbitrator within five days, the Court shall pick the Arbitrator. TENTATIVE RULING #5: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED ON FRIDAY, APRIL 17, 2026, AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT NINE.
8
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.