DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26FL0050·eldorado·Civil·Custody / Visitation
CONTINUED

MAHCOYA-ROSE OSTROM V. MATTHEW BAKER

Request for Order (RFO) regarding custody and visitation

Hearing date
Apr 16, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 23, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Petition

Parties

PlaintiffMAHCOYA-ROSE OSTROM
DefendantMATTHEW BAKER

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 April 16, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

8. MAHCOYA-ROSE OSTROM V. MATTHEW BAKER 26FL0050

On January 27, 2026, Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking custody and visitation orders. The parties were referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) and a review hearing was set for the present date.

Respondent has not filed a Responsive Declaration to Request for Order.

The parties were originally scheduled to attend CCRC on February 19th, however, due to inclement weather, neither party was able to appear. Accordingly, CCRC was rescheduled for March 26th.

Only Petitioner appeared at the rescheduled CCRC appointment. It is unclear if either parent was properly served with notice of the rescheduled date.

In light of the circumstances, the court finds it best to re-refer the parties to CCRC. The parties are to attend CCRC on Thursday, May 28th at 9:00 AM. A review hearing is set for Thursday, July 23rd at 8:30 AM in Department 5. Hearing on the RFO is continued to join with the CCRC review hearing. Supplemental Declarations are due to be served no later than 10 days prior to the review hearing.

TENTATIVE RULING #8: THE PARTIES ARE TO ATTEND CCRC ON THURSDAY, MAY 28TH AT 9:00 AM. A REVIEW HEARING IS SET FOR THURSDAY, JULY 23RD AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 5. HEARING ON THE RFO IS CONTINUED TO JOIN WITH THE CCRC REVIEW HEARING. SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATIONS ARE DUE TO BE SERVED NO LATER THAN 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE REVIEW HEARING.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share