DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
22PR00620·butte·Probate·Probate
GRANTED

Estate of Marble, Kenneth Riley

First and Final Account and Report

Hearing date
May 5, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Nov 3, 2026

Motion type

Petition

Ruling

May 5, 2026

Current Probate Tentative Rulings

Case Time Style Tentative Number

Estate of 9:00 17PR00109 At the request of counsel this matter is continued to November 3, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. Richter, Larry D

Estate of 9:00 18PR00410 Huang, At the request of counsel this matter is continued to May 4, 2027 at 9:00 a.m. Solomon

Estate of 9:00 19PR00255 Cortez, Rodolfo The Court will hear from counsel as to the status of filing the ex parte petition for final discharge. M

Estate of The Final Distribution hearing is set for May 12, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., the hearing on May 5, 2026 is off 9:00 19PR00451 Rogers, Arvel calendar. No appearances are required. Russell

Estate of John 9:00 20PR00331 At the request of counsel this matter is continued November 3, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. Doe No 1

Estate of 9:00 21PR00224 Hironimus, John At the request of counsel this matter is continued to May 26, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. C.

Guardianship At the request of counsel this matter is continued to July 7, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. The Court will sign 9:00 21PR00570 of: Thomas, the form of order submitted by counsel. Tryston Edward

Estate of 9:00 22PR00155 Seaman, Robert At the request of counsel this matter is continued to May 4, 2027 at 9:00 a.m. Lloyd

Estate of Veach, 9:00 22PR00602 At the request of counsel this matter is continued to December 1, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. Mikel James

Estate of Absent objection, the First and Final Account and Report is settled and approved, the Review Hearing 9:00 22PR00620 Marble, Kenneth on June 9, 2026 is vacated, and the matter is set for a final discharge hearing on November 3, 2026 Riley at 9:00 a.m. Counsel shall submit a form of order within two weeks.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share