DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
19PR00255·butte·Probate·Probate
The Court will hear from counsel

Estate of Cortez, Rodolfo M

Ex Parte Petition for Final Discharge

Hearing date
May 5, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Ex Parte ApplicationPetition

Ruling

May 5, 2026

Current Probate Tentative Rulings

Case Time Style Tentative Number

Estate of 9:00 17PR00109 At the request of counsel this matter is continued to November 3, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. Richter, Larry D

Estate of 9:00 18PR00410 Huang, At the request of counsel this matter is continued to May 4, 2027 at 9:00 a.m. Solomon

Estate of 9:00 19PR00255 Cortez, Rodolfo The Court will hear from counsel as to the status of filing the ex parte petition for final discharge. M

Estate of The Final Distribution hearing is set for May 12, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., the hearing on May 5, 2026 is off 9:00 19PR00451 Rogers, Arvel calendar. No appearances are required. Russell

Estate of John 9:00 20PR00331 At the request of counsel this matter is continued November 3, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. Doe No 1

Estate of 9:00 21PR00224 Hironimus, John At the request of counsel this matter is continued to May 26, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. C.

Guardianship At the request of counsel this matter is continued to July 7, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. The Court will sign 9:00 21PR00570 of: Thomas, the form of order submitted by counsel. Tryston Edward

Estate of 9:00 22PR00155 Seaman, Robert At the request of counsel this matter is continued to May 4, 2027 at 9:00 a.m. Lloyd

Estate of Veach, 9:00 22PR00602 At the request of counsel this matter is continued to December 1, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. Mikel James

Estate of Absent objection, the First and Final Account and Report is settled and approved, the Review Hearing 9:00 22PR00620 Marble, Kenneth on June 9, 2026 is vacated, and the matter is set for a final discharge hearing on November 3, 2026 Riley at 9:00 a.m. Counsel shall submit a form of order within two weeks.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share