Woo vs. General Motors, LLC

own treatment of Plaintiff. Dr. Haghverdian provides a reasoned basis for his standard of care and causation opinions and disputes the findings of Dr. Kolodenker. Thus, there is a triable issue of material fact as to the elements of breach of duty and causation such that the motion must be DENIED.

Plaintiff shall provide notice.

10 Casate vs. Allview Real Estate

2026-01542936 Motion to Strike Complaint

Continued to 6/25/26. See minute order dated 6/1/26.

11 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian vs. Monarch Health Plan, Inc.

2026-01546114 Demurrer to Amended Complaint

Continued to 7/23/26. See minute order dated 6/1/26. 12 Woo vs. General Motors, LLC

2025-01518945 Motion for Attorney Fees

Continued to 7/23/26. See minute order dated 6/8/26.

13 Rayas vs. Padilla

2023-01367764 Motion to Disqualify Attorney of Record

Plaintiff Fernando J. Rayas’ motion to disqualify Callahan & Blaine, PC from representing Canchola-Padilla Limited Partnership [“Partnership”] is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 128, subd. (a)(5), 284, subd. (2) [court’s authority]; Responsible Citizens v. Superior Court (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 1717, 1723-1724 [court’s authority to disqualify counsel “on a showing that disqualification is required under professional standards governing avoidance of conflicts of interest or potential adverse use of confidential information”]; Jarvis v. Jarvis (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 113, 128 [disqualifying partnership counsel based on lack of authority of equal partner to appoint same].)

Moving party has not shown the existence of a conflict requiring disqualification of Partnership counsel. The fact that Padilla and the Partnership both contend the Partnership is dissolved, does not mean that Partnership counsel cannot represent the Partnership’s best interests, and moving party cites no authority that it does. (Dickson, Carlson &