Prashant Tiwari, Phd, vs Monte Kaehr, et. al.

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 21CV386366 Christopher Morales The partition referee seeks confirmation of the partition referee’s sale of property. 1 vs. Del Real Lopez The confirmation of sale is GRANTED. 9:00 23CV414851 Bank of America v. Plaintiff moves this court to allow Plaintiff to amend caption of complaint. Platiniff’s 2 John Campona motion is GRANTED. 9:00 24CV446754 Lesniak vs. County of See below 3 Santa Clara

9:00 24CV454184 Erlach vs. General See below 4 Motors 9:00 24CV454605 Jenna Arruda vs. Plaintiffs move this court to quash a subpoena for each of Plaintiff’s medical 5 Trenna Sutcliffe providers. Since Plaintiff has placed her mental health at issue it appears the subpoenas are relevant. A protective order is in place. Plaintiff’s motion to quash is DENIED. 9:00 25CV458954 Kostick & Wang, LLC Defendant petitions this court to compel discovery responses; deem the truth of all 6 vs. Jia Sung matters specified in requests for admissions admitted; and a motion for sanctions in the amount of $2,480.00.

These requests were served on Plaintiff on August 11, 2025. Plaintiff failed to respond. Defendant petitioned this court on January 23, 2026. Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to Defendant’s petition. Defendant’s petition to compel discovery responses is GRANTED. Defendant’s request to deem the truth of all matters specified in its request for admissions is GRANTED. Defendant’s motion for sanctions in the amount of $2,480.00 is GRANTED. 9:00 25CV464655 Unsuk Heo vs. FCA Defendant petitions this court to compel Plaintiff to attend a deposition and 7 US, LLC produce documents.

Defendant propounded this request on July 9, 2025 and had originally set a deposition date for October 6, 2025. Plaintiff later served his objection to the date on the basis of unavailability. Since then, Defendant has made several attempts to reach Defendant to set a new date and propound discovery. On December 23, 2025, Defendant filed its petition to compel. Plaintiff did not respond. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to attend a deposition within thirty days of the granting of this order. 9:00 25CV467995 Prashant Tiwari, Phd, Off calendar 8 vs Monte Kaehr, et. al. 9:00 25CV471732 Creditors Adjustment Plaintiff petitioned this court to compel responses to Plaintiff’s first set of special 9 Bureau vs.

Olguin interrogatories and requests monetary sanctions for not complying. Plaintiff and Vazquez emailed defendant his first set of special interrogatories on December 10, 2025. Landscape & Tree Defendant never responded and issued no objection to Plaintiff’s petition. Service. Plaintiff’s motion to compel is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,875.41 is GRANTED. 9:00 25CV474448 Milz Development & See below 10-11 Construction vs. Shawn Dean, et. al. 9:00 25CV483492 Mario Diaz Ruiz v.