DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
25CV00186·butte·Civil·Discovery
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Estate of Tyler E. Simmons et al v. Sladariu, Benjamin

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records

Hearing date
Apr 15, 2026
Department
N/A
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Motion to Compel Discovery

Parties

PlaintiffEstate of Tyler E. Simmons
DefendantSladariu, Benjamin

Ruling

8-9. 24CV01499 Pete, David v. Tink, Inc.

EVENT: (1) Final Approval Hearing (2) Case Management Conference

Motion for Final Approval of Class Action is GRANTED. A compliance hearing is set for January 13, 2027 at 9:00am. Plaintiff shall file a status report not later than December 30, 2026. The Court will sign the proposed order with this modification.

10. 24CV04405 Solano, Eligio Levya v. Gridley Packing, Inc.

EVENT: Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement

Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement is GRANTED. A final approval hearing is hereby set for August 12, 2026 at 9:00am. The Court will sign the proposed order with this modification.

11. 25CV00186 Estate of Tyler E. Simmons et al v. Sladariu, Benjamin

EVENT: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Compliance with Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Although there is a proof of service indicating opposing counsel was served with this motion, the Court is not finding a proof of service demonstrating the District Attorney was served with this motion.

3|Page

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share