DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
23CV02889·butte·Civil·Confidentiality
GRANTED

In re: Rivera, Chenoa

Petitioner’s Ex Parte Request to Make Case Records Confidential Pursuant to Senate Bill No. 59

Hearing date
Apr 15, 2026
Department
N/A
Judge
Prevailing
Petitioner

Motion type

Ex Parte Application

Parties

PetitionerRivera, Chenoa

Ruling

5. 23CV02889 In re: Rivera, Chenoa

EVENT: Petitioner’s Ex Parte Request to Make Case Records Confidential Pursuant to Senate Bill No. 59

Petitioner’s Ex Parte Request to Make Case Records Confidential Pursuant to Senate Bill No. 59 is GRANTED. The Court will sign the proposed order.

6. 23CV02958 Lomeli, Baneli et al. v. Environmental Alternatives

EVENT: Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement

Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement is GRANTED. A final approval hearing is hereby set for August 12, 2026 at 9:00am. The Court will sign the proposed order with this modification.

7. 24CV00627 Norcal Home Design, Inc. v. First Response, Inc et al.

EVENT: Motion of Defense First Response Inc. To Have Requests for Admissions Deemed Admitted, to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents, and for Imposition of Monetary Sanctions Against Plaintiff and Counsel

In light of the discovery responses served by Plaintiff, the motion is moot. The Court is not considering whether the discovery responses are code compliant at this time. The request for sanctions is denied. While technically Defendant is correct that meet and confer is not required in these circumstances, the failure to meet and confer is relevant on the issue of sanctions when there appears to be a legitimate explanation for the delay in providing responses.

2|Page

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share