DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26CV00246·butte·Civil·Probate
GRANTED

In re: Siemeng, Matthew

Change of name (adult)

Hearing date
Apr 8, 2026
Department
Unknown
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Other

Parties

PetitionerMatthew Siemeng

Ruling

11. 26CV00104 Jennifer L Mitchell LLC v. Burgess and Sons Construction LLC

EVENT: Motion for Prevailing Party Attorney Fees

Motion for Prevailing Party Attorney Fees is GRANTED. Attorney fees and costs are awarded in the sum of $4,312.79. The Court will sign the proposed order.

12. 26CV00246 In re: Siemeng, Matthew

EVENT: Change of name (adult)

The Court is in receipt of the proof of publication and will sign the decree provided.

13-15. 26CV00449 Layman, Zeke v. Autumn Creek Post Acute

EVENT: (1) Petition for Alternative Writ of Mandate (2) OSC re: Preliminary Injunction (3) Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

In light of the Amended Petition filed on March 16, 2026, the OSC re: preliminary injunction is moot. (The Court notes that the TRO was previously denied) Because Respondents have yet to appear in the case, the filing of the Amended Petition re-sets Petitioner’s service of process obligations. Under these circumstances, the Amended Petition must be served consistent with the rules regarding the service of summons. (See Engebretson & Co. v. Harrison (1981) 125 Cal.App.3d 436, 442) The proof of service filed on 3/16/26 with respect to the Amended Petition does not meet the service requirements of the service of summons. Because the Amended Petition does not indicate what type of entity Respondent is (i.e. a corporation, a DBA, etc.) it is unclear

11 | P a g e

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share