DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CVPB21-0031175·shasta·Probate·Estate Administration
GRANTED

ESTATE OF LARRE JENSEN

Petition for Preliminary Distribution; Petition for Order Directing Return of Possession

Hearing date
May 11, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Petition

Monetary amounts referenced

$690,459.66

Parties

OtherMs. Arroyo

Ruling

This matter is on calendar for further proceedings regarding the Petition for Preliminary Distribution and Petition for Order Directing Return of Possession of Real and Personal Property. The Supplemental Inventory and Appraisal filed on April 27, 2026, despite that the amount of the bond as stated on the Inventory and Appraisal is incorrect. The amount of bond $690,459.66, as stated on proof of bond filed November 04, 2025.

Regarding the Petition for Preliminary Distribution, the Court previously determined the matter to be properly noticed with proof of service on file. An amended Petition or supplemental declaration has not been filed providing the respective share of the estate for each intestate heir as previously ordered. However, the Court has determined the respective share of the estate of each heir. Notice to Creditors was filed on May 3, 2022, and no creditor’s claims have been filed. The estate is sufficient to award the requested preliminary distribution. The Petition is GRANTED. A proposed Order has been submitted and will be executed by the Court. 9

The Petition for Order Directing Return of Possession of Real and Personal Property has been properly noticed. Although a formal objection has not been filed, the Court notes Ms. Arroyo personally appeared at the last hearing. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share