DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26PC-0033209·shasta·Probate·Conservatorship
CONTINUED

CONSERVATORSHIP OF ROBERTA COX

Petition for Appointment of Conservator of the Person and Estate

Hearing date
May 11, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 22, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Petition

Parties

OtherPublic Defender

Ruling

This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on a Petition for Appointment of Conservator of the Person and Estate. An amended Petition has not been filed to address the issues raised on April 6, 2026. A new Citation was not issued for today’s date or served on the Conservatee to address the issues raised on February 23, 2026. A Capacity Declaration has not been filed. The Court has reviewed the Court Investigator’s report filed on February 13, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition. The report states that the Conservatee will attend the hearing. The Conservatee previously appeared and objected to the appointment of a Conservator. The Public Defender has been appointed as counsel for the Conservatee. The matter is continued to Monday, June 22, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings regarding the Petition for Appointment of Conservator of the Person and Estate. A new Citation must be issued and served on the Conservatee, with proof of service filed with the Court. An amended Petition is required to be filed. A new Notice of Hearing must be filed and served for the continued hearing date, along with a copy of the amended Petition, on all parties entitled to notice. A Capacity Declaration is required to be filed. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share