DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26PB-0033310·shasta·Probate·Estate Administration
GRANTED

ESTATE OF KERRY ROSE

Petition for Letters of Administration

Hearing date
May 11, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Sep 14, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Petition

Ruling

11

ESTATE OF KERRY ROSE CASE NUMBER: 26PB-0033310 This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Letters of Admi nistration. The matter has been properly noticed, with proof of service on file. Proof of proper publication has been filed. No objections have been raised. The paperwork appears to be in order. The Petition i s GRANTED. A proposed Order was lodged with the Court and will be executed. The requirement of a bo nd has been properly waived, and letters shall issue. The matter is set for Monday, September 14, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for Confirmation of Filing the Inventory and Appraisal. The matter is set for Monday, May 17, 2027, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for Status of Administration. The Personal Representative is ORDERED to comply with Probate Code Section 12200 et seq. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF GORODON ROTH CASE NUMBER: 25PB-0033123 This matter is on calendar for further proceedings on an Objection to the decedent’s will, filed by Kim Schulz. The matter has not been properly noticed. There is no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Petition for Martha Blobgett or Anthony Roth. A summons has been issued regarding the Objection, however there is no proof of service of the summons on any parties entitled to notice. The matter is continued to Monday, June 29, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings regarding the Objection. A new Notice of Hearing is required to be timely filed and served, along with a copy of the Objection, on all parties entitled to notice. A summons is required to be issued and served in compliance with Probate Code 8250. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF SANDRA SANCHEZ CASE NUMBER: CVPB22-0031457 This matter is on calendar to confirm the filing of Receipts and a Petition for Final Discharge. No receipts have been filed. No Petition for Final Discharge has been submitted. A Status Report has been filed stating additional time is needed before the documents can be filed. The matter is continued to Monday, July 13, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 to confirm filing of Receipts and a Petition for Final Discharge. If the documents cannot be filed prior to the next hearing, the Court ORDERS a Status Report be filed and served at least five court days before the next hearing date to advis e what must be accomplished before the documents can be filed. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF MILDRED TRELOAR CASE NUMBER: 25PB-0032986 This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Final Distribution on Waiver of Accounting. The matter has not been properly noticed. There is no proof of service for any parties entitled to notice. The Court notes a proposed order has not been lodged as required by Local Rule 15.06. The matter is continued to Monday, June 15, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings regarding the Petition for Final Distribution on Waiver of Accounting. Petitioner is required to file and serve a new Notice of Hearing for the continued hearing date, along with a copy of the Petition, on all parties entitled to notice. Proof of service is required to be filed. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

ESTATE OF PATRICIA V AUGHN CASE NUMBER: 26PB-0033234 This matter is on calendar for hearing on an amended Petition for Probate of Lost Will. The matter has been properly noticed with proof of service on file. Proof of proper publication has been filed. The amended Petition filed on April 2, 2026, fails to overcome the presumption under Probate Code Section

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share