DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
26CV-0209772·shasta·Civil·Civil
Appearance necessary

REGO VS. HO

Review hearing

Hearing date
May 18, 2026
Department
63
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffRego
DefendantHo

Ruling

8

O2 STAFFING, INC. VS. AHRENS, ET AL. CASE NUMBER: 24CV-0205621 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of bankruptcy. Plaintiff filed a status statement informing the Court that the bankruptcy filed by Defendant Delight Foods, Inc. remains pending. The matter is continued to Monday, July 20, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for status of bankruptcy. Status statements shall be filed at least five court days in advance of the next hearing. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

REGO VS. HO CASE NUMBER: 26CV-0209772 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of judgment/di smissal. Plaintiff filed a Notice of Unconditional Settlement on February 13, 2026 indicating that the matte r would be dismissed within 45 days. The matter has not been dismissed and no status statement was filed. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar. Absent an appearance and good cause being presented, the Court intends to dismiss the matter without prejudice per CRC 3.1385(b).

SHARIT VS. DELIGHT FOODS, INC. CASE NUMBER: 23CV-0202449 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of bankruptcy. T he parties did not file a status statement as ordered on November 17, 2025, however, the Court is aware from the status report fil ed in case 205621 (O2 Staffing, Inc. v. Ahrens) that the bankruptcy is still pending. The matter is continued to Monday, July 20, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for status of bankruptcy. Status statements shall be filed at least five court days in advance of the next hearing. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

TERRANA VS. PECK, ET AL. CASE NUMBER: 24CV-0205039 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of case and tria l setting. At the last appearance on March 16, 2026, the Court was informed that Defendant Jeanette Peck died. No status statements were filed. The matter is continued to Monday, July 27, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for status of the case. Status statements shall be filed at least five court days in advance of the next hea ring. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. $464,079.92 UNITED STATES CURRENCY CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0208558 Disclosure by the Court: The Court makes the following disclosure to all parties in this case. Judge Benjamin L. Hanna discloses that his spouse is an employee of the Shasta County District Attorney’s Office. That office represents Petitioner, the People of the State of California, in this action. The Court has no reason to believe that Judge Hanna’s spouse had any involvement in the investigation, management, or prosecution of this case, but does find it appropriate to disclose the employment relationship between the Court’s family member and counsel for the People of the State of California.

This asset forfeiture matter is on calendar for review regarding status of criminal proceeding. The District Attorney filed a status report informing the Court that the criminal matter was trailing for a trial assignment. The matter is continued to Monday, July 27 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for status of the case. Status statements shall be filed at least five court days in advance of the next hearing. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share