DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
24CV454281·santaclara·Civil·Consumer Warranty
GRANTED IN PART

Alvaro Pedroza v. Ford Motor Company et al.

Motion to compel discovery

Hearing date
May 12, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Motion to Compel Discovery

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,734$1,200

Parties

PlaintiffAlvaro Pedroza
DefendantFord Motor Company

Ruling

In sum, the motion to compel is GRANTED IN PART. Ford is ordered to provide documents responsive to request for production Nos. 30, 50, and 51, as follows: Complaints or concerns made by California customers of vehicles that are of the same year, make, and model as Plaintiff’s vehicle, which is a 2023 Ford F-150 Crew Cab, with 4-wheel L/H pat time drive, equipped with a 3.5L V6 engine, and a Mod Hybrid Transaxle-A10R80 MHT-X, and involving the agreed symptoms from Plaintiff’s repair records allegedly exhibited in Plaintiff’s vehicle. Ford must produce those documents no later than June 12, 2026. Ford’s counsel is ordered to pay plaintiff $1,200 in sanctions no later than June 12, 2026. The court will prepare the order.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share