Santa Clara Valley Water District v. The City of San Jose, et al.

Notice is proper. The Court has received no opposition from Defendant. “[T]he failure to file an opposition creates an inference that the motion or demurrer is meritorious.” (Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.) Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED. The truth of all specified facts in the Request for Admissions, Set One, propounded by Plaintiff on Defendant on July 10, 2025 shall be deemed admitted. Plaintiff to prepare the final order that repeats the admissions to be admitted verbatim, accompanied by the necessary Form EFS-020, within 7 days of the date of the hearing. SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230

DATE: 05/13/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.

LINE 4 25CV470867 Michael Leobo v. Kaiser Permanente et al. DEMURRER

Demurrer to the FAC is Unopposed and Sustained with 15 days leave to amend LINE 5 25CV475894 Santa Clara Valley Water District v. The City of San Jose, et al. MOTION: ORDER

Plaintiff Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Motion for Prejudgment Possession

Notice is proper. Unopposed. Good cause appearing, the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff to prepare the proposed order, accompanied by the necessary Form EFS-020, within 7 days of the hearing.