PETITION FOR AN ORDER TO REMOVE SUCCESSOR CO-TRUSTEE FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY AND FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Estate of Robert Bernard Hope 24PR000315
PETITION FOR DETERMINATION OF HEIRS (Pr. Code, § 11700)
APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The Petition is in order and sets forth good cause for the relief requested. No objections appear in the Court’s file. (See Prob. Code, § 1022.) However, all interested parties have the right to appear and object to the Petition orally or in writing at the hearing. (See Prob. Code § 1043.) Therefore, appearance is required in the event that any objection is made at hearing. Absent such objection, the Court is prepared to GRANT the Petition.
Estate of Stoddard, Clara Juree (G) 26-25033
PETITION FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION AND WAIVER OF ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF EXECUTOR, PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF STATUTORY FEES TO PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE
TENTATIVE RULING: The request for waiver of an accounting is DENIED. The matter is CONTINUED to June 25, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B.
“The personal representative shall file a final account and petition for an order for final distribution of the estate when the estate is in a condition to be closed.” (Prob. Code, § 10951.) The Court does not find grounds presented for a waiver of this requirement. (See Prob. Code § 10954.) There are no waivers on file for identified beneficiaries Amberly Krupcznski, Paul Stoddard, Serrenity Ryan and Jeffery Stoddard Ware.
In The Matter of Steven N. Ferrara Revocable Living Trust 26PR000026
FIRST AMENDED PETITION BY TRUSTEE TO DETERMINE TITLE TO PROPERTY
APPEARANCE REQUIRED.
In the Matter of the Amended and Restated 26PR000073 Ruth Johnson Martin Revocable Trust
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
PETITION FOR AN ORDER TO REMOVE SUCCESSOR CO-TRUSTEE FOR BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY AND FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Prob. Code §§ 15642, 17200)
APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The parties shall attend prepared to discuss whether any opposition is anticipated, whether the parties intend to submit on verified pleadings and affidavits (see Evangelho v. Presoto (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 615, 620), whether any discovery or other pre-hearing practice is anticipated, and whether the parties are willing to participate in 3
informal settlement discussions or other alternative dispute resolution proceedings. Should any party desire an evidentiary hearing, the parties shall be prepared to provide the Court with an estimate for the length of the hearing, and to set the hearing on the Court’s calendar. Counsel are directed to meet and confer on the foregoing issues prior to the hearing.
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Gary Loebner, as Trustee of the Russell B. Peck Revocable Trust 21CV000055 dated as of October 15, 2004 vs Thomas O'Connor, as an individual and as Trustee of the Carolyn O'Connor Credit Shelter Trust et al
MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion is GRANTED.
The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing.
Michelle Henry-Ellis v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc, et al 24CV001387
[1] DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF MICHELLE HENRY-ELLIS TO PROVIDE FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to serve verified, code-compliant responses to Defendants’ Requests for Admissions, Set One, Nos. 3, 8- 14, and 16-20, no later than 10 calendar days from Notice of Entry of the present ruling. Defendants are directed to provide Notice of Entry of Order.
Defendants Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc., Vino Bello Resort [sued erroneously herein as Travel + Leisure Co.], and Shell Owners Association - West (collectively, “Defendants”) move, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.010, et seq., 1 for an order compelling Plaintiff Michelle Henry-Ellis (“Plaintiff”) to provide further responses to Defendants’ Request for Admissions, Set One, Nos. 3, 8-14, and 16-20, within 10 days of the date of hearing.
1 All subsequent statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise specified.
4