JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. vs. LJT Holdings II LLC

1) 111 S HEARTWOODWAY, ANAHEIM, CA92801 2) 201 S MAGNOLIA AVE APT 43, ANAHEIM, CA 92804 (ROAs 37, 39) Counsel is ordered to appear and provide information to the Court as to Plaintiff Client’s last known address, and what steps (other than a skip trace), Counsel has taken to acquire that information. To the extent the Court is satisfied that it has acquired Plaintiff Client’s address, it will grant the motion 2. Case Management Conference

105 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. vs. LJT Holdings II LLC

25-01514141 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record John P. Swenson, Janae L. Hill, and Arden Burstein (“Moving Counsel”) move to be relieved as Counsel of Record for Defendant LJT Holdings II, LLC. The notice of motion and motion, the declaration, and the proposed order must be served on the client and on all other parties who have appeared in the case. (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d).) Proof of service of the moving papers must be filed no later than five court days before the hearing date. (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1300(c).) Although Moving Counsel provides that the moving papers were served on the client by mail, the proof of service attached to the moving papers does not reflect such service.

Moving Counsel is ordered to file proof of service of the moving papers on the client. Said proof of service to be filed no later than nine (9) court days before the continued hearing date of July 28, 2026, at 10:00 AM. Moving party to give notice.

106 Safavi vs. Ghadiri

25-01522424

1. Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens 2. Case Management Conference Defendant, Nasrin Ghadiri (“Defendant”), moves for an order expunging the Notice of Pendency of Action (“Lis Pendens”) recorded by Plaintiff and approved on April 14, 2026. No opposition has been filed.

Initially, Defendant has filed a proof of service indicating that Plaintiff was served with the moving papers by electronic service on April 20, 2026. Both Plaintiff and Defendant are self-represented. California Rules of Court, rule 2.253(b)(2) provides that “[s]elf-represented parties or other self-represented persons are exempt from any mandatory electronic filing and service requirements adopted by courts under this rule and Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6.”

Additionally, “[i]n civil cases involving both represented and self-represented parties or other persons, represented parties or other persons may be required to file and serve documents electronically; however, in these cases, each self-represented party or other person is to file, serve, and be served with documents by non-electronic means unless the self-represented party or other person affirmatively agrees otherwise.” (California Rules of Court, rule 2.253(b)(3), emphasis added.)

“An unrepresented party may consent to receive electronic service.” (Code Civ. Proc. §1010.6(c)(2).) Express consent to electronic service may be given by either (1) serving a notice on all parties and filing the notice with the court, or (2) “[m]anifesting affirmative consent through electronic means with the court or the