CAPITAL ONE v. COTTLE

May 1, 2026 Dept. 9 Tentative Rulings

5. 25CV2946 CAPITAL ONE v. COTTLE Motion to Set-Aside

The Court entered judgment on January 13, 2026, in the amount of $4,520.83. Defendant filed a Motion to Set-Aside on March 18, 2026, on the grounds of inadvertence, surprise, mistake or excusable neglect under CCP § 473(b). Defendant complied with the requirements of CCP §473 in filing a proposed Answer. [B]ecause the law strongly favors trial and disposition on the merits, any doubts in applying section 473 must be resolved in favor of the party seeking relief from default (Waite v. Southern Pacific Co. (1923) 192 Cal. 467, 470-471 [221 P. 204]; Carli v.

Superior Court (1984) 152 Cal.App.3d 1095, 1099 [199 Cal.Rptr. 583] [in the context of deemed admissions § 473 should be applied liberally “so cases can be tried on the merits”]; Flores v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at p. 483.) . . . A motion seeking such relief lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and the trial court's decision will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion. (Weitz v. Yankosky (1966) 63 Cal.2d 849, 854 [48 Cal.Rptr. 620, 409 P.2d 700]; Martin v.

Cook (1977) 68 Cal.App.3d 799, 807 [137 Cal.Rptr. 434].)

Elston v. City of Turlock, 38 Cal. 3d 227, 233, 695 P.2d 713 (1985). TENTATIVE RULING #5: MOTION TO SET-ASIDE DEFAULT IS GRANTED. NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6551 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M.