Dismissal status
April 6, 2026, Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
1. CL0002141 Discover Bank vs. Sequoia U. Nicholas Appearances are required. All parties shall show cause why they should not be sanctioned for failing to appear as ordered on February 2, 2026.
2. CL0002994 U.S. Bank National Association vs. Dylan Cauraugh No appearances are required. The Court dismisses this matter without prejudice and retains jurisdiction pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6.
3. CL0003187 Mercury Insurance Company vs. William Tanner Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the Court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
4. CL0003643 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Holly Korbonski No appearances are required. A status regarding default judgment is set for June 15, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall submit a complete request for default judgment at least two weeks prior thereto.
5. CU0001304 Sergey Degtyarev v. Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to April 5, 2027, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this matter, filed April 3, 2024, should not be dismissed pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 583.420(a)(1) (dismissal for failure to serve summons within two years after commencement of action). The Clerk shall serve the order at the last known address of record for Zita Rutkauskaite, spouse of Plaintiff (deceased), in Tinley Park, IL.
6. CU0001721 Makyla C. Savitri v. Jeff Thompson Appearances are required for status regarding dismissal. If the parties wish the Court to retain jurisdiction, they should file a written stipulation under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 or state their agreement regarding the same on the record.
7. CU0001845 Mark Gold, et al. vs. Robert A. Tonnies, et al. No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to May 4, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. This case appears to be at issue. However, Defendants’ prior counsel was recently relieved and defendants have failed to timely file a case management conference statement. All parties shall file a timely case management conference statement prior to the continued court date including recommendations as to available dates for purposes of trial.
8. CU0001978 Bridgett Higginbotham vs. Pacific Specialty Insurance, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to July 20, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit adjudication of pending
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”