Motion for Attorneys Fees
provided routine postoperative follow-up care, and referred Plaintiff to a specialist evaluation when she later complained of swelling. Defendant has met his initial burden and Plaintiff has failed to establish a triable issue of material fact.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME T.G. VS CORONA- CVRI2501478 NORCO UNIFIED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES SCHOOL DISTRICT Tentative Ruling:
GRANT. Petitioner is awarded attorney’s fees of $27,187.50.
Petitioners’ action has resulted in the enforcement of an important right affecting public interest. Hence, Petitioner is entitled to attorney’s fees under CCP § 1021.5.
The court finds that the total attorney’s time expended in the prosecution of this action (72.5 hours) to be reasonable. Petitioner entered into a hybrid hourly/contingency fee type agreement with his attorney. The requested billing rate of $500 per hour is excessive for the Riverside geographic area. The prevailing rates for this area are $350 to $375 per hour. Hence, the court will award the lodestar attorney’s fees in this case of $27,187.50 (72.5 hours x $375 per hour). No multiplier is awarded as this case was not extraordinarily complex nor novel.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL ROGERS-HARLESS VS DEFENDANT’S RESPONSES TO CVRI2503497 GILL FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE AND MONETARY SANCTIONS Tentative Ruling:
GRANT.
Verified responses, without objection, are Ordered within 15 days.
Defendant Harindarpal Gill and his attorney of record are sanctioned in the sum of $750, payable to Plaintiff’s counsel within 30 days.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”