MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT
Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CABRERA VS RITCHIE CVRI2403102 BROS.AUCTIONEERS HEARING RE: FINAL APPROVAL (AMERICA) INC. Tentative Ruling:
Grant. Need to select date for review of administrator’s report (order, ¶ 24).
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY SANCHEZ VS PT & CVRI2500696 APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION COMPANY, INC. SETTLEMENT Tentative Ruling: Appearances requested to discuss:
1. No declaration from defense counsel; is counsel aware of any other action making similar class, collective or representative claims?
2. Was a bidding process used and was ILYM Group the low bidder?
3. No declaration from ILYM Group.
4. Why isn’t defendant paying employer-side payroll taxes in addition to, rather than from, the GSA?
5. No proof that the settlement was sent to the LWDA.
6. Add definition of released parties to the notice. Use final approval hearing or fairness hearing, but not both, in the notice. Correct reference in the bale on page 1 of the notice from section III to sections IV and V.
7. No declaration from defendant concerning class members likely age, education, experience and ability to read a notice in English.
8. Revise opt out form to make it clear that opting out of the class settlement will not exclude the person from the PAGA settlement.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME ALEXANDER VS STRIDE MOTION APPLICATION TO APPEAR CVRI2505206 RITE CHILDREN'S AS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE GROUP, LLC Tentative Ruling:
Grant; court will sign proposed order after hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”